The spider mites have returned. They crawled up from
whatever god forsaken place they had hidden, strung their insidious webs and
are now slowing leaching my plants dry. I do not like them. They frustrate me horribly. I take an
aggressive stance when they appear. I kill them.
I have but a small collection of tropicals: a philodendron,
two gardenias, three orchids (of which I wrote about last March), two begonias,
a Saintpaulia, a Dracaena, a Pachira and a bamboo. They either have come from
rough beginnings (i.e. the orchids and the begonia) or are cuttings received
from friends. I have a thing for bringing plants back to life. So when some
spineless tetranychidae comes
to feed, I get angry.
Unfortunately, my anger doesn’t help much so I clean and
prune instead. It’s an ongoing job. The mites are relentless. The technique I
have found to be most effective is soaking the leaves in soapy water then
putting the plant under a plastic bag for 2-3 days. Mites dislike humidity. It
keeps the little bugs at bay for several months, sometimes more. However, my
bamboo seems to be chronically affected. Drastic action is called for. I prune
with little mercy, soap and cover it with plastic. After a few days when I feel
I have the upper hand, I shall prune my bamboo down to base and change the
soil. They will not kill this plant.
Like most people, I do not enjoy watching humans or animals die.
Our impulse is to do something, anything, to stop the process. It does not matter
that death is natural and a foregone conclusion, a part of us feels like it
dies too when another succumbs. I extend these feelings to plants and some
insects; mites, of course, excluded. It feels somewhat wrong to be biased in
this way, after all, a life is a life regardless of the being’s state of
consciousness or, I should say, our assumed belief of that state. But we all
draw a line somewhere about what is worthy of life and what is not; that is
mine.
Still, that line of mine that honours most beings is not so solid.
Sure I respect the lives of animals, plants and some insects but I still eat
them—the latter most unintentionally. Although I am politically against
factory farming, penned up animals and the poor economics behind feeding corn
to livestock, my body (unlike those of practicing vegans) does not like to
abstain—I tried it for a year and felt the negative effects for far too long.
Instead I buy range fed cattle and cage free chicken eggs. I keep my intake
down to a minimum and try to pay respect to the animal it was when I eat it. My
line, you see, has its issues.
We all draw lines. Some are rigid; some are like one
mentioned above. Lines like that can waver and meander, swirling their way into
big loops or interesting gaps depending on the situation. My line against wasteful
logging practices is another example: I prefer actual books to reading on-line
and posted letters to e-cards. If I was a staunch conservationist I’d be holding a
Kindle at night. I don’t. I am also an anti-plastic activist but still wash my polypro clothing even
though I know microscopic plastic bits are ending up in the ocean. Interesting
gaps to be sure.
There are lines that some draw that are quite rigid.
Outside of those that delineate universal moral taboos there are the more individualistic ones that
purport to know the truth: I am right; you are wrong. These lines can grow in
dimension becoming rigid behemoths where the drawer of said lines can become morally
lost and disorientated. Like the politicians who vote for draconian drugs law and
then are found buying coke on the street or say abortion is immoral but want to
reinstate capital punishment. And even if the lines drawn do not grow in such
proportion, you can see it in our everyday lives: nice people who “wouldn’t
hurt a fly” buying sweatshop clothes or turning a blind eye to how their
computers are built.
I have a friend who has a lovely saying: “Hypocrites
welcome”. I see it
as an invitation to acknowledge and own our internal and external contradictions.
And I don’t mean to own and then ignore like we do with exercise equipment. I
mean to really own and build awareness around these grey zones. Like be a pro-lifer but fight for better sex education and free birth control or vow to reinstate capital punishment but work to abolish racial prejudice that puts too many people of colour on death row. Say "no to drugs" but fund better treatment programs and stop criminalizing the end user. Promote trade with totalitarian countries but make human rights a condition for better pricing. Eat fish caught with ethical practices; protest pipelines but start stop driving your car when you can ride a bus; and abstain from buying the latest digital toys each year just because they are new. These solutions in
themselves won’t save the world. They will, however, help us regain our
humanity.
In other words, we need to constantly examine and reexamine our
beliefs. To find ways to dismantle walls of rigidity, own our contradictions and open our hearts to new ways of being. This will not only help us be more compassionate to those who think and act differently but more compassionate to
ourselves when we find that the lines we have drawn are not so straight.
Good, thought provoking article. I think you're right, but when I've done that it seems as if I'm sitting on the proverbial fence. But, then again, who says we need to take sides?
ReplyDeleteGreat topic ... it certainly conjures up a lot of emotion and thoughts in me. In particular my early days of starting on my lifelong vegetarian journey. As a six year old and into my twenties I had a difficult time with others opinions and judgements. When I would share that I am vegetarian, I had many people scan down to see what I was wearing on my feet. "Leather?...hmm well not a very dedicated vegetarian..." What your comments remind me of is that we are not perfect, we do our best, we care and do what we can and perhaps it is this idea of either or...being on one side or the other that keeps us from collectively finding creative solutions to the many issues that you name. thanks for this....
ReplyDeleteThanks Carla and Bonnie for your comments. I think you both hit it on the head: do we really need to take sides? Maybe if more of us sit on the fence it will collapse with all the weight ... no need for sides when there are no lines drawn or fences built.
ReplyDelete